Every figure a US cannabis regulator actually publishes — charted, traceable to the document it came from, and never estimated.
- 30 full data pages
- 18 stated absences
- Newest figure covers a period that ended 3 days ago
- Every figure traceable to its regulator
- How this site checks itself
- Full data page 24
- Published, with a stated caveat 6
- Work in progress - no usable data yet 18
- No legal cannabis market 8
Beyond the fifty states
5 jurisdictions this site reviewed that a map of the fifty states has no shape to colour — and being hard to draw is not a reason to leave one out. Each carries the same card as everything on the map, and its own page.
Colour states what a regulator publishes, not how big its market is. A jurisdiction with no colour was not in this site's 2026 research sweep, which covered every US jurisdiction with a legal cannabis market — so there is no regulator series to carry and no page to open. The full inventory below is the same information as a list, and is the way to read this page without the map.
Basemap: US Census Bureau cartographic boundary files, public domain, in an Albers USA projection. No figure on this map is estimated, and none is summed across jurisdictions — the comparison sets out why a single national total is not published here.
The most recent data on the site
Ranked by how long ago the period each figure covers came to an end, counted on this build's date. A jurisdiction that publishes weekly will always lead a list like this and one that publishes quarterly will always trail it — that is the true answer to which data is most recent, not a fault in the ranking.
The full inventory
46 US cannabis jurisdictions were researched in 2026, each with a live fetch of every source it claims to publish, and the 2 pages this site already ran are folded in beside them — 48 in total. This page is the result: who publishes a usable market series, who does not, and in every case what specifically is absent. Nothing here is estimated, and no figure appears on this site that its regulator did not publish.
Live pages
30 of 30Full pages with a monthly series, per-field gap handling and a stated basis for every figure.
Work in progress
18Reviewed, and not yet carryable on what these jurisdictions publish today. The obstacle differs in every case and is stated rather than summarised. Each has its own page stating the programme status, the regulator, exactly what is not published and why — and, where one exists, the named event that would change the answer. A jurisdiction that is simply missing looks like an oversight; a stated absence is a finding.
- Alabama
A market this new has usually not built its reporting yet. The absence is expected rather than obstructive, which is why it is on the watchlist.
- Arkansas
The data exists and is not published. That is a different absence from 'the data does not exist', and the difference matters: unblocking Arkansas needs a standing FOIA request, not a URL.
- Eastern Band of Cherokee Indians (Qualla Boundary)
A sovereign tribal market inside a prohibition state. It is listed under its own name and NEVER folded into North Carolina: doing so would imply that a state with no legal sales has them, and would corrupt any per-capita or state-map figure it touched.
- Georgia
A licence roster is the whole dataset. Georgia would be one column in a cross-state table and nothing else, so it is listed rather than charted.
- Guam
A legal market that has not opened has no data, and the figures that circulate about it are secondhand.
- Hawaii
Patients plus an annual tax total is not a market series. It cannot join the monthly comparison and it cannot carry a page of its own.
- Iowa
An annual figure fourteen months in arrears cannot join a monthly comparison, and the alternative may or may not exist. Listing Iowa with what IS known is more honest than a page with one number on it.
- Kentucky
Too new to have a series, and the one page that looks like a series is dead. A frozen page that returns 200 is the most dangerous kind of source, so it is named here rather than quietly ignored.
- Louisiana
A producer-side annual report cannot answer what consumers spent, which is this site's headline measure everywhere else.
- Missouri
Deferred, not excluded. Missouri is the one jurisdiction on this list whose absence is a decision about fragility rather than about the data: the path is proven end to end, and it stops working the day the Download button moves. Display-rounded figures would also sit on the same axis as exact ones without saying so.
- Nebraska
Pre-launch. Listed so the absence is a stated fact rather than an omission.
- New Hampshire
There is no market to measure and no sales series to measure it with.
- North Dakota
This is a statutory ceiling, not a publishing habit. No amount of asking produces a monthly figure, because the statute forbids one.
- Northern Mariana Islands
Where there is no tracking system there is no dataset, however willing the regulator is.
- Puerto Rico
Deferred for v1 on a legal question, not a data one. The V2A licensing clause governing use of the regulator's material is a question for a lawyer, and publishing first and asking afterwards is not how this site handles a licence it has not read. That applies to the figures as much as to the document: none are repeated here.
- South Dakota
No sales series, and the counts that do exist are not internally consistent between the state's own two pages.
- Texas
A page whose only content is a patient count is a row in a table, not a page.
- US Virgin Islands
Nothing has been sold, so there is no market figure that is not an estimate. An estimate is not what this site publishes.
How a jurisdiction gets classified
Every source was fetched, not assumed
A source enters the plan only after a live fetch proves its format, its cadence and how far back it goes. Several well-indexed government URLs return HTTP 200 with plausible data and are frozen, dead or relocated; those are recorded so nobody wires them up later.
A gap is never a zero
Where a regulator prints a dash, a suppression marker or nothing at all, this site renders the absence and its reason. Publishing that as $0.00 would state that a market existed and sold nothing, which is a different and false claim.
Grains are never mixed
A state that publishes quarterly is charted quarterly. There is no interpolation anywhere on this site: a monthly figure a regulator did not publish is an invented number, whatever arithmetic produced it.
Vendor data is labelled on sight
A few states link a private vendor's figures instead of publishing their own. Those series are usable and are shown, but every chart and tile carrying one says vendor data, not state-published — it is not the state speaking.